The propaganda of social networks Reviewed by Momizat on . "What!?! you're not on facebook ?!?"  Why is that question so surprising? Whenever I encounter someone who doesn't have a profile on facebook I find myself wond "What!?! you're not on facebook ?!?"  Why is that question so surprising? Whenever I encounter someone who doesn't have a profile on facebook I find myself wond Rating: 0
You Are Here: Home » Political Economy » The propaganda of social networks

The propaganda of social networks

The propaganda of social networks
“What!?! you’re not on facebook ?!?”  Why is that question so surprising? Whenever I encounter someone who doesn’t have a profile on facebook I find myself wondering why. It seems to be such a trivial question these days. Where did it come from?  What attracts and keeps people connected to the social network? What is the motivation of people refusing to join?  The impact of social networks on everything from social, political to economic spheres is undeniable; we as users and active participants in this monumental experience are all too busy marveling at its beauty and functionality that it becomes easy to let our guards down and forget to examine the personal and social effects of this technological and social phenomena. Even more importantly, how did it become the status quo. The numbers are staggering, more and more people decide to join for a multitude of reasons.

In 1965 Jacques Ellul published his brilliant book, simply titled, “Propaganda“.  The introduction to the book, written by Konrad Kellen, gives the readers a glimpse of the main arguments posed by Ellul. One central thesis is that propaganda, is a social phenomena that cannot survive nor exist without the technological society and vice versa. In other words, Ellul claims that propaganda as a social phenomenon, is a Siamese twin of the technological society.  It is only by the effects of this propaganda can the technological society exist and flourish.   The supreme law of propaganda, to Ellul, is its effectiveness. Propaganda must be effective, if it is not, it is not propaganda. watching
 people flock together to the social network, its popularity and ultimate grasp on our daily lives, seems to be like the result of a very effective propaganda. There are many definitions of the word “Propaganda”, researchers, philosophers and many others each tried to come up with the ultimate definition.  Majority of them seem to agree that it constitute the use of deliberate actions   aimed at influencing audiences to change/maintain opinions and/or actions by use of psychological means.


This makes one wonder of the hypnotizing and extraordinary  grasp that social networks have on our lives.  Exploring the origins of the social networks and network society, many researchers including but not limited to: Manuel Castells, Scott Lash, Danah M Boyd, Nicole B Ellison and many others paint a magnificent picture of the factors that brought about this phenomena into existence. Today, many researchers, professionals and advocates hale and marvel at these great social phenomena that were able to flourish thanks to advancements in technology. Looking at the social network from a philosophical point of view, it may be seen as “god’s gift” to democracy and freedom of expression.

We are led to believe that the social network works for us. On the surface it may appear so: citizens have brought down regimes, activists have managed to take on multi-million dollar co-operations, families re-united, relationships are formed each and every day, and so on. The list of benefits is as endless as the network itself.  On the opposite side of the coin, it is no surprise that each user is also working for the network.  An effective propaganda is one that leads people for actions and make them think that it is for their own good, to be part of something greater than one self. The social network provides exactly that. A chance for the individual to feel part of something, to belong, while the propagandist is capitalizing on his success.  Do we need this propaganda to flourish? Do we require this propaganda to excel and develop further? For Ellul the answer is simple. Yes.

“In my opnion, necessity never establishes legitimacy; the world of necessity is a world of weakness, a world that denies man” 

Jacques Ellul (1962)

Print Friendly

About The Author

Amit Louis is the founder and owner of tw3. Currently he lives in Toronto. Amit has an MA in Communications from the University of Tel Aviv and a BA High Honours in Mass communication from Carleton University in Ottawa, Ontario. Amit enjoys research (especially those "ah ha" moments) that leads to an insightful fact based story. His passion lies with teaching, instructing, marketing, communication, all things media, and people!

Number of Entries : 16

© 2011 Powered By Wordpress

Scroll to top